<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bradley Robb &#187; print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/tag/print/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradleyrobb.net</link>
	<description>I&#039;m Here Purely To Amuse Myself</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:54:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The 1200 Word Trap</title>
		<link>http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/2008/09/the-1200-word-trap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/2008/09/the-1200-word-trap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word count]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking for Word Counts and Page lengths? Check here the new Writing Resource Section. As silly as this might sound, I have grown quite accustomed to framing my thoughts into two very different lengths – 140 characters and 1200 words. &#8230; <a href="http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/2008/09/the-1200-word-trap/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Looking for Word Counts and Page lengths? Check here the new <a href="/on/writing-resources/word-counts/" target="_self">Writing Resource Section</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>As silly as this might sound, I have grown quite accustomed to framing my thoughts into two very different lengths – 140 characters and 1200 words. The first, of course, is for Twitter. The second, however, comes from the few years that I wrote for a local entertainment rag. The article which I was to hand in was usually the same article I wrote the month prior, but with the details swapped out.  These articles were always 1200 to 1300 words.</p>
<p>It’s a hard train of thought to get out of, that 1200 word rut. Two pages of single-spaced, 10-point font. 1200 words is enough time to devise a witty introduction, delve into a bit of history, make three solid points, and then wrap up in an earnest fashion. Despite how formulaic this seems, it’s a formula for a reason – it works.</p>
<p>However, 1200 words on the internet is, well, an eternity. Correction, it’s an eternity when the hook doesn’t warrant it. It’s funny, I got started writing ahem “professional” non-fiction online before making the jump to print. Now that I’m coming back, I’m having issues dealing with a lack of a newshole. So, as I’m wrapping things up here on the construction side, expect to see a higher volume of material, just not in the oh-so-familiar 1200 word length.</p>
<p>Oh, and for the record, 140 characters is the perfect length for being an asshole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/2008/09/the-1200-word-trap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

