<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Faux Pas &#8211; Case Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/technology/social-media-faux-pas-case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/technology/social-media-faux-pas-case-study/</link>
	<description>Writing That Puts Story First</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mariane</title>
		<link>http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/technology/social-media-faux-pas-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/?p=732#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>For someone claiming to be the best, he didn&#039;t proofread his blog entry for typos and careless writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For someone claiming to be the best, he didn&#8217;t proofread his blog entry for typos and careless writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Leone</title>
		<link>http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/technology/social-media-faux-pas-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Leone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/?p=732#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>@Arlene

Thanks for your comment. I think your points are valid. It was my interpretation that Dave was not being serious when he made claims as being the best, however I know him on a personal level and am used to his unique sense of humor. That being said, I can totally understand how it could be interpreted literally and I&#039;m actually not surprised that&#039;s what happened.

Dave has since added some more to his apology and I encourage you to take a look. Also, our company&#039;s president has written a response that I also encourage you to read when you get a chance.

Thanks again for your input. I hope I was able to clear the air, if only a little bit. 

-Chris Leone
Web Strategies Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Arlene</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. I think your points are valid. It was my interpretation that Dave was not being serious when he made claims as being the best, however I know him on a personal level and am used to his unique sense of humor. That being said, I can totally understand how it could be interpreted literally and I&#8217;m actually not surprised that&#8217;s what happened.</p>
<p>Dave has since added some more to his apology and I encourage you to take a look. Also, our company&#8217;s president has written a response that I also encourage you to read when you get a chance.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your input. I hope I was able to clear the air, if only a little bit. </p>
<p>-Chris Leone<br />
Web Strategies Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Bradley Robb</title>
		<link>http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/technology/social-media-faux-pas-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Bradley Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/?p=732#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in agreement with you there, Alrene. The original blog post was taken down and replaced with a half apology ( http://bit.ly/c95LL ). I think what bothers me the most, and this is stemming from my background as a journalist, was the lack of editorial balance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in agreement with you there, Alrene. The original blog post was taken down and replaced with a half apology ( <a href="http://bit.ly/c95LL" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/c95LL</a> ). I think what bothers me the most, and this is stemming from my background as a journalist, was the lack of editorial balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arlene Wszalek</title>
		<link>http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/technology/social-media-faux-pas-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>Arlene Wszalek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradleyrobb.net/on/?p=732#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>A few thoughts:

1) Saying you&#039;re &quot;the best&quot; at something is better left to let others to do on your behalf. Still, if you&#039;re going to blow your own horn, better to cite a source (preferably, a respected industry group or award) than to just make the claim.

2) This is a case where &quot;show, don&#039;t tell&quot; could have helped. If you think you&#039;re the best, why do you think that? Link to what you consider your finest work.

3) The ostensible goal of this particular blog could have been accomplished without being self-referential. We&#039;re all inspired by the work and innovations of others in our field. It would have been great to do a post about designers whose work he admires, or with whom he wishes he could work someday, etc.

With respect to a reaction, he could start with a mea culpa. And of course the best response at all is to do superb work and have happy clients. Even if one is &quot;the best,&quot; there will always be haters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few thoughts:</p>
<p>1) Saying you&#8217;re &#8220;the best&#8221; at something is better left to let others to do on your behalf. Still, if you&#8217;re going to blow your own horn, better to cite a source (preferably, a respected industry group or award) than to just make the claim.</p>
<p>2) This is a case where &#8220;show, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; could have helped. If you think you&#8217;re the best, why do you think that? Link to what you consider your finest work.</p>
<p>3) The ostensible goal of this particular blog could have been accomplished without being self-referential. We&#8217;re all inspired by the work and innovations of others in our field. It would have been great to do a post about designers whose work he admires, or with whom he wishes he could work someday, etc.</p>
<p>With respect to a reaction, he could start with a mea culpa. And of course the best response at all is to do superb work and have happy clients. Even if one is &#8220;the best,&#8221; there will always be haters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
